snixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoSilent anger*lemmy.mlimagemessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1233arrow-down18
arrow-up1225arrow-down1imageSilent anger*lemmy.mlsnixyz123@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square55fedilink
minus-squareairportline@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up22arrow-down2·2 years ago.webp is a good format. It’s Adobe’s fault for not properly supporting it.
minus-squarehyperdriveguy@vlemmy.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down1·2 years agoBetter compression and more features, it’s really nice for reducing website load times
minus-squareLifter@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoIt takes less download but more CPU to unpack it so the loading time depends on your connection and hardware. In extreme cases it may be worse than png.
.webp is a good format. It’s Adobe’s fault for not properly supporting it.
What’s its advantages?
Better compression and more features, it’s really nice for reducing website load times
It takes less download but more CPU to unpack it so the loading time depends on your connection and hardware. In extreme cases it may be worse than png.
webp: nahhhh
jpegXL: yooooo