• baker@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    We’re conditioned to invest, both financially and emotionally, not only in what a game is right now, but what it will be in a year. We cling to roadmaps like lifeboats and wield Reddit threads as weapons of sentiment for or against the developers we’ve hitched our wagons to. It’s a fuzzy parasocial relationship that only gets less healthy the more money is wrapped up in it. I’m sick of games that glare at me with dollar signs in their eyes from the moment I press play.

    This review heated up fast

  • ScreaminOctopus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The lack of a battle pass is really great imo, whenever games include them it puts a bad taste in my mouth. It’s also really scratching the BF3/4 itch that’s been missing from the market since Dice took Battlefield in a less vehicle focused direction, and tossed any sort of thoughtful map design off a cliff.

  • drifty@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Using FACEit anti cheat and dropping Linux is a bad look. The game also doesn’t have any sound effects except for bullets. The moderation for proximity chat is also very strict, beware.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The catch is anticheat. They had a working one that didn’t ban Linux but they changed to a different anticheat that bans Linux users. Don’t buy this pro-big tech trash.

  • ABearAttack@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been playing it myself. It’s been so damn good. It feels like a love letter to bad company 2 with a few modern tweaks.

  • ultimate_question@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    There’s no battle pass, no cosmetic store (though there is a $20 “Supporter Pack” that comes with gun skins)

    The fact that they already have “a” microtransaction available means they invested a significant amount of time building out the infrastructure required to support them, there is a 0% chance they aren’t planning on putting in more once the game gets big

    • TeaHands@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not familiar with the game in question, but look at games like Deep Rock Galactic. No pay to win there, but they sell plenty of purely cosmetic “supporter” DLC because people do in fact like to show support when they think they’ve got a good deal and are enjoying the game.

      • ultimate_question@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s a fair point, I just think it’s a little early to be hyping up a game for not having microtransactions when we don’t really know what the plan is