Hoo boy. Not a good look AMD. It was scummy when nVidia did this, it’s scummy when you do it.

  • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I mean this is literally just sponsoring a game

    This usually means only FSR, no DLSS. What does it matter that FSR can be used on all hardware, if it’s the inferior technology? Let those who can use DLSS, and others FSR and XeSS.

    Since it’s your mom-and-pop multi-billion dollar company, it’s fine that they screw over consumers. They are not like the evil multi-billion dollar company from down the road.

    • valpackett@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Keeping out a vendor-specific one in favor of a vendor-agnostic one seems actually positive to me. That vendor-specific “superiority” must be fought.

      • Sev@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Agreed. The net effect of this kind of choice - what the person above you is saying - is exactly the intended effect. It lowers the value of Nvidia users’ cards to them, but, critically, only because Nvidia plays these bullshit exclusivity games.

        Nvidia users can’t get the most out of their cards on a big, popular new game and they’re all mad about it? Well, there’s an easy fix, Nvidia, to prevent these situations in the future: Just open DLSS up to everybody. Boom, done. AMD and Bethesda aren’t the ones being assholes, here, and it’s not their fault that Nvidia’s customers aren’t getting the most out of their cards.