• squiblet@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a matter of working on the prompt interpreter.

    For what I was saying, there’s no assumption: models trained on more data and more specific data can definitely do the usual information summary tasks more accurately. This is already being used to create specialized models for legal, programming and accounting.

    • EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’re right about information summary, and the models are getting better at that.

      I guess my point is just be careful. We assume a lot about AI’s abilities and it’s objectively very impressive, but some fundamental things will always be hard or impossible for it until we discover new architectures.

      • squiblet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that while it’s powerful and the capabilities are novel, it’s more limited than many think. Some people believe current “ai” systems/models can do just anything, like legal briefs or entire working programs in any language.The truth and accuracy flaws necessitate some serious rethinking. There are, like your above example, major flaws when you try to do something like simple arithmetic, since the system is not really thinking about it.