• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Hot take: LLMs is the best thing has happened to open source movement:

    • software copyright is defeated and basically eliminated in practice
    • reverse engineering is so accessible that proprietary protocols cannot be hidden and can be reimplemented by AI agents as free software
    • open weight LLMs are incredibly competitive and run on general hardware
    • linux is de facto winner in all computing and rising in desktop and gaming niches

    We’re literally in the golden age of free software

    • Cricket@lemmy.zip@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re conflating open source and free software with public domain. Open source software licenses are completely dependent on software copyright. This means that if software copyright were eliminated, open source licenses would become completely unenforceable. We may be headed in this direction anyway, but I just thought I would make the point.

    • SleeplessCityLights@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      That would be cool and all, but people stopped reading their code. At work if I can not explain every line of my PR, it will get rejected. I use it as a powerful tool but a lot of people just output code and think their trash belongs in production.

      • dubs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Although I agree with you, I had that issue well before AI was a thing:

        “I dunno, I just copied it from this StackOverflow post…”

        <cut to me raging that someone would do that>

    • TrollAccount69@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Llms have been great for finding and fixing bugs and cranking out code, but the systems that allow for generation of code at a direct cost of dollars as opposed to the overhead of managing and employing programmers aren’t under the intense pressure to not redo old work and so are disincentivized from either creating or contributing to open source projects.