• Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Nooooooo, socks must always be on. Socks are an crucial clothing item that determines how naked the individual is.

    With socks on, you’re never naked. Without socks, you’re always naked.

    Though an important qualifier, those must be proper socks, not one of those odd slippery toe warmers. Those things should be incinerated at the factory where those were made.

    • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Someone wearing socks and nothing else is still very naked.

      As a police officer explained the other day, nakedness is generally based on whether your “rude bits” are visible.

      He also explained that a cafe/bar offering a “bottomless brunch” should be thought of as “like a bottomless pit of drink and food - endless refills” rather than “akin to a topless beach, where you fully undress one half of your body”.

      • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Obviously, it’s purely feelings based not rooted in legality. Without socks, but fully clothed, i feel more naked and exposed than with socks, but naked otherwise.

        Though it can be easily solved with an extra sock on a tactical location.

      • Klear@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Someone wearing socks and nothing else is still very naked.

        I feel more naked with just socks on than when wearing nothing at all.