• huppakee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If the half of the population includes the part that owns cars perhaps, but the carbon footprint of a person varries greatly. In general the more money someone has the higher the burden they are on the climate.

    • Seleni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      The problem is mathematically it just doesn’t work. Humans are too good at reproducing. We’d be back in force before too long.

      No, the only way is more death note style, taking out billionaires and some of their bootlicking buddies, and those who put profit over the planet’s health. It’s perfectly possible for the rest of us to patch things up—we almost did it with the ozone. (Until guess who decided they wanted to throw money around to force us to stop.)

      • huppakee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I think we humans have grown to a population size where anyone’s profit hurting the planets health should be stopped. We need to take protecting the planet’s (in some ways fragile) ecosystem as serious as we take protecting children against abuse for example. Future generations will have to learn or we will find out together what fucking around gets us.

    • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Idk, I feel like targeting living beings is different than targeting structures, even though I know a sudden lack of refined oil would lead to death. I’m just convinced they’ll never stop until their own heat deaths.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’d go for the quick and painless snap over the long drawn out biotic crisis caused by the removal of a key resource but that’s only because I’m a humanitarian.

            • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              4 billion instantaneously without even a chance is just too much for me. At least with the refineries I can lie to myself and say I gave everyone a chance by not immediately removing people from existence.

    • kettuli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They don’t refine oil for people to consume it, they refine oil to generate shareholder value.