sanitation@lemmy.today to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agoNo one spells "lose" anymorelemmy.todayimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up1159arrow-down113file-text
arrow-up1146arrow-down1imageNo one spells "lose" anymorelemmy.todaysanitation@lemmy.today to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 21 hours agomessage-square98fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLemmywinks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 hours agoAccording to Merriam-Webster they included its non-literal use in their dictionary since at least 1909.
minus-squareDJKJuicy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-29 hours agoWell I went back to the Merriam Webster page from 2010 and all the news articles from 2013 about changing the definition of literally are objectively bullshit, so I was wrong. Merriam Webster Literally 2010
According to Merriam-Webster they included its non-literal use in their dictionary since at least 1909.
Well I went back to the Merriam Webster page from 2010 and all the news articles from 2013 about changing the definition of literally are objectively bullshit, so I was wrong.
Merriam Webster Literally 2010