If youre going to debate CITE research of your own. Dont just come in with random opinions with little research backing them.
The point of scientific debate is that YOUR science is larger and /or more rigorous than your opponent’s thus proving thst youre probably more correct on the matter than they are.
If someone or I say ‘im the reincarnation of Mao-Tse-Tung!’ , does anybody hare have to believe me unless I can prove it? How would I be able to prove that without medical records that prove that it is the undeniable truth?
But you do not know what my original response was because it was removed, is that what your proposal is? To remove any counter views without any discourse at all. Is that your idea of debate within a community or how research is reviewed.
If youre going to debate CITE research of your own. Dont just come in with random opinions with little research backing them.
The point of scientific debate is that YOUR science is larger and /or more rigorous than your opponent’s thus proving thst youre probably more correct on the matter than they are.
If someone or I say ‘im the reincarnation of Mao-Tse-Tung!’ , does anybody hare have to believe me unless I can prove it? How would I be able to prove that without medical records that prove that it is the undeniable truth?
But you do not know what my original response was because it was removed, is that what your proposal is? To remove any counter views without any discourse at all. Is that your idea of debate within a community or how research is reviewed.