• hhg@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Avocado oil should have 884 kcal per 100g, therefore one serving of 0.25g would be 2.21 kcal. Why is that allowed to be rounded to zero?

    • Daedskin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s rounded to the nearest multiple of 10; it could be up to 5 (exclusively), and could still be listed as 0. It’s why so many lower-calorie products are listed with a zero-calorie serving size in the US. I’m not sure about the specifics of regulations — if any exist — on selecting serving sizes; this particular example feels a little fishy to me.

      • Fushuan [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s an arbitrary rounding I’ve yet to see in packagings here. A lot of calorie numbers end in other values. Yeah the comma is usually rounded but that’s it.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because they are allowed to do their own testing to determine caloric quantity and there is often some flubbing in the recipe during the testing. Kinda like how VWs used to have a different engine mode for emissions tests than normal driving.

      • Logi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        They’re multiplying by the 0.25g serving size, then rounding the 0.25g of fat down to 0g and calculating the calories from that? I can barely imagine the apoplectic rage this would have triggered in my experimental physics professor.