• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    The underlying technology isn’t unprofitable, inference alone isn’t unprofitable. It’s the research and development of better models that’s unprofitable and unsustainable.

    Investment IS gambling, some people will win, some will lose.

    That’s pretty much how almost every new development happens. EVs were the same, primarily funded by subsidies and now they’re cost competitive or better in many situations even without them. Cellphone networks… also heavily funded by investors and some took hits from how it all played out. The dotcom bubble. Even as far back as the Railroad boom in the UK. This is a tale as old as time.

    • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      isn’t unprofitable

      Yes it is. The only things its useful and efficient for are all laid out in either ‘1984’ or the Geneva conventions.

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I wouldn’t put a fancy and stupidly resource-intensive word guessing game on the same level as those other things.