• Xeno@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    The addition of the red hat means the people pictured actually support the elites in question.

    Having said that, you’re talking about violent revolution. Look at basically every example in history. They all get much worse before they get better. The people that need to die, die. Sure. And it’s satisfying because those people historically have grown beyond what conventional institutions of justice could do anything about. Problem is, the revolution doesn’t just stop once the problem is gone. People don’t stop dying, they just stop deserving it.

    Point is, people are armed as a desperate last resort that we pray we will never need, because people who’ve actually fought in wars know that outcome is far worse and far more horrifying than any diplomatic compromise would have been. War is not how you solve a handful of wealthy elites who are effectively above the law. It’s how you solve families being executed in the streets or put into concentration camps. We’re not there yet. Though admittedly we’re closer than we’ve ever been - ironically thanks to people in red hats.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      They all get much worse before they get better. The people that need to die, die. Sure. And it’s satisfying because those people historically have grown beyond what conventional institutions of justice could do anything about. Problem is, the revolution doesn’t just stop once the problem is gone. People don’t stop dying, they just stop deserving it.

      Source: saw it in a reddit meme.

      It’s how you solve families being executed in the streets or put into concentration camps. We’re not there yet.

      You objectively are, and have been for a long time.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      Revolution has dramatically improved the lives of the people in most cases. They usually have a chaotic period of stabilization, but in the long run bring immense positives, especially in socialist countries.

      • Xeno@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Of course they do. Historically they’ve only happened when a country reached a point where there were was no other recourse. At that point, of course they’re going to make things better - “worse” isn’t really a possibility when revolution becomes necessary, which is kind of the point. Leaping to war before that point, on the other hand… well, there aren’t any examples of that which come to mind. Which suggests that, on the bright side, people apparently tend not to resort to revolution until it’s actually required.

        • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Historically they’ve only happened when a country reached a point where there were was no other recourse

          Hindsight 20/20 or something like that.
          I am very confident that you would not be saying this about the Russian Empire in its later years.

    • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      We’re not there yet.

      Which is exactly why a revolution hasn’t happened yet. Revolutions do not occur until every other option has been tried and the people find their circumstances utterly intolerable. I advocate for revolution because we will eventually reach that point and need to be prepared for when that revolutionary potential is ripe. I need people to understand that the class division of society cannot be overcome by using the tools handed to us by the ruling class, that we must make our own through a vanguard party that can turn revolutionary potential into directed revolutionary action. I am not saying REVOLUTION NOW because we are not organized enough and the national proletariat are not so desperate. I am saying revolution is the only way however, as awful as it will inevitably be.

      Edit: i want to stress that premature revolutions are dangerous. The premature revolution in the Weimar Republic contributed to the rise of fascism. Which is again why professional revolutionaries in the form of a vanguard party is necessary. We must have people who make revolution their life so that they understand how ready we are in a way the average person does not.

      • Xeno@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        13 hours ago

        100%. I’m with you there. And I am prepared, very probably far more so than any of the people downvoting me, who will ironically end up following men like me when the real violence begins (assuming they don’t just hide) precisely because we’ve been through it and know what to expect and what to be ready for - which, in turn, is exactly why we will do everything we can to prevent it from coming to that.

      • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, just look at the majority of people and their ideology. The next revolution, wherever it happens is going to be fascist. The only thing we could do is propaganda (and even that is really hard to do well).

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Fascists are not revolutionary, they seek to entrench the present system violently. This is why voting cannot stop them, only revolution can.

          • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            23 hours ago

            Yes, but if the revolution happens, they will definitely make it fascist. That’s what I was trying to say (but I did it somewhat shitily). We really need to be careful to protect ourselves and others in the event of revolution (both from other dangerous people and from fascist ideology).

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              24 hours ago

              How would they make it fascist? All of the fascists are organized within the existing state, therefore an assault on the capitalist state would also take out the fascist levers of power. Only organized socialists could take power.

              • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                Most people aren’t really into ideology (or Wikipedia for that matter). They just figure out the system is the problem. The only people being an actual part of the revolution would ve intellectuals, easy to repress. That would make the revolution from an actual revolution to the people enrolling a Nazi into power and doing nothing else.

                Well yes, technically that would just be a repressed revolution. Aparently I just parroted the OP’s point and haven’t added anything that important. Shit.

                But the ruling class doesn’t have to do an organized attempt of repression, they can just be done by people themselves.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  Any revolution, in order to happen, needs an organized party that is trusted and supported by the rest of the working classes. Rather than being the only ones a part of the revolution, it is the job of the vanguard to lead the revolution. Without that support it’s just a coup and would fail.

        • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          22 hours ago

          Fascist don’t “revolt” because they do not inact revolutionary change. They preserve the existing dominance of capital. They also aren’t the majority of people, they only seem that way in the western context. Most people do not live in imperial core nations. The next big revolutions will come out of Africa, Latin America, and Asia. These revolutions will weaken the imperial states to the point that they to can be revolted against (imo)

    • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      You are not going to get any diplomatic compromises if elites don’t believe you can guillotine them. Everything is just going to get worse until you get either collapse or revolution.