• amio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    On the other hand, totally did not see this particular shit coming. I wonder if we’ll see a rash of “permissive, except LLMs can fuck right off” licenses.

    • Lev@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Permissive licences should be the ones to fuck off entirely. GPL or death

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        No, libraries should remain permissive IMO. Applications can be restrictive if they want to. I just don’t see any point in a copyleft library or framework.

      • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: there is a place for permissive licenses. A great example is reference code for open standards, eg. TCP/IP.

        • Lev@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          Permissive licences are useful compared to copyleft ones only for unfree actors, which we should fight integrally at every step of the way