(if the video player doesn’t work)
One last example :
Of course, any author of science-fiction warned about robots rebelling against their creators, right now LLMs have zero memory but it seems impossible to prevent a random engineer in h·er·is basement to create a rogue a.i., good luck to us
It won’t end class conflict. That is not have capitalism works unfortunately.
Exploiting human workers is much more problematic than exploiting robots. In a post-scarcity society everyone would have access to healthcare, food, housing, energy, and any goods and services.
Robots will make robots, and raw materials will be automatically mined until taken from asteroids.
However i agree that ideally these robots should be collectively owned, or equally alloted so that individuals loan them to companies, with a public control ensuring that the equilibrium is maintained.
There should also be a prevention over the influence of the wealthy in politics, otherwise they’ll find out a way to have more at the detriment of everyone else in their selfish race to be the number one(, e.g. artificial scarcity, planned obsolescence, oligopolies, influence in politics, …)
In short, i guess what i meant was to point at the elimination of poverty. However, i agree with you that we’ll still need political institutions protecting us from the selfishness of the wealthy, otherwise there could be an increasingly inequal share of the ‘surplus obtained from’/‘exploitation of’ these robots between the wealthy and the poor.