i just used the word “profitable” cuz its shorter than “morally non justifiable nonsense” and because its a metric thats much more easy to fact check and not as subjective as moral complains.
i just used the word “profitable” cuz its shorter than “morally non justifiable nonsense” and because its a metric that’s much more easy to fact check and not as subjective as moral complains.
I don’t quite seem to understand what you mean or what you tried to say with this meme then.
There is much more then just “subjective moral complains” or a neoliberal standing point to look for profits in everything.
I mean yes. Profit Numbers are more easy to look up maybe. But… it doesn’t really help does it? Its not a metric that’s important at all, like you also agreed to.
Meme is structured in a way to target ppl who claiming that nuclear energy is “cheap” and hence a solution to the climate change.
The conclusion should be, its not cheap and there are better ways to fight climate change than building more nuclear plants.
Ah. Then I think I understand what you’re trying to do. If you at least use these triggered people and arguments correctly in the comments against them, then this is a tactic, I guess. I didn’t read what you wrote in the other comments, but I just hope for the best now. After all you agreed to me. Then I was just not part of the targeted group. I wish you a nice day. o7
100% agree
i just used the word “profitable” cuz its shorter than “morally non justifiable nonsense” and because its a metric thats much more easy to fact check and not as subjective as moral complains.
Huh? alright then.
I don’t quite seem to understand what you mean or what you tried to say with this meme then. There is much more then just “subjective moral complains” or a neoliberal standing point to look for profits in everything. I mean yes. Profit Numbers are more easy to look up maybe. But… it doesn’t really help does it? Its not a metric that’s important at all, like you also agreed to.
Meme is structured in a way to target ppl who claiming that nuclear energy is “cheap” and hence a solution to the climate change. The conclusion should be, its not cheap and there are better ways to fight climate change than building more nuclear plants.
Ah. Then I think I understand what you’re trying to do. If you at least use these triggered people and arguments correctly in the comments against them, then this is a tactic, I guess. I didn’t read what you wrote in the other comments, but I just hope for the best now. After all you agreed to me. Then I was just not part of the targeted group. I wish you a nice day. o7