• CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Chernobyl, Fukushima, 3 Mile Island. Plus uranium is another non-renewable resource.

    I’m still pro nuke as getting off fossil fuels is of the utmost urgency, but we will have to learn to live off wind and solar.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      So what has released more uncontrolled waste into the world, all the nukes including those, or the equivalent mega-wattage of all other human power generation? Our entire global community is FUCKED to the tune of hundreds of trillions of dollars from consequences of petro, while meanwhile very few of us are suffering from the effects of nuclear power generation. Nukes don’t replace solar and wind, they complement them.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The question was “why is public sentiment so against nuclear?” and they answered, with a note that they personally support it over fossil fuels.

      • LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Ah yes, the Fusion Reactors that are coming soon ™ (promised decades ago).

        We need energy now, not at some unknown point in the future. Of course, resaeching this technology may make sense. But it does not help today and also not the next 20 years.

        • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, putting your hopes / goals on a fusion powered future is foolish at this point.

          But I def support (lots of) research into it.

            • hayvan@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Deskto pLinux is here, and it’s fine. I wish it was more popular but that doesn’t stop me from doing all my development, video editing, music , gaming on Linux.

      • Gladaed@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Having become a carbon neutral economy a couple years ago since we obviously adhere to the Paris agreement this does not seem like a good solution as we already (would have to have) deployed solutions based on current technology.

        • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Agree that we can get to carbon neutral / carbon negative with current tech.

          I do think making plans based on having it are foolish at best.

          But I do think we need to keep working on research of it. If we ever hope to achieve a world with “electricity too cheap to meter”, nuclear fusion is the key to it. (That and dyson spheres, but that’s kinda not in scope of discussion).

          • Gladaed@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Electric power too cheap to meter exists and it’s called solar power.

            Renewables are dirt cheap. Hoping for even more abundance is forgetting that it’s already ridiculous.

    • Courtney (she/her/they) @lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’d love to see a full production chain breakdown of disasters and their costs to clean up, for both fossil fuel and nuclear.

      Most people’s issue is “ooh scary radiation!” without realizing you get more exposure to ionizing radiation by living near a coal fired power plant than a nuclear one. Fuck, you can take a swim in the reactor pool and if you’re under the surface away from the nuclear material, the water above you blocks the background radiation you’d be exposed to walking around on the surface.