cm0002@suppo.fi to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agoTech bros having their production environments nuked by AI is never gonna get oldsuppo.fiimagemessage-square159fedilinkarrow-up1945arrow-down110
arrow-up1935arrow-down1imageTech bros having their production environments nuked by AI is never gonna get oldsuppo.ficm0002@suppo.fi to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square159fedilink
minus-squareClent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up73arrow-down1·4 days agoHaving production credentials in a dev environment is more stupider but they’ll never learn because they outsourced their thinking.
minus-squareBluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·3 days agoThe thing is Claude would have told them that too, it probably did tbh and they just clicked right through the warning
minus-squareuuj8za@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·3 days ago aarg. claude not happy. arg. warn. go away. ah, claude happy now. Dev cycles now.
minus-squarepurplemonkeymad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down1·3 days agoEveryone has a development environment, but not everyone has a separate production environment. This is almost certainly the case of dev happening in the live environment.
minus-squareClent@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·3 days ago Everyone has a development environment, but not everyone has a separate production environment. I think you meant to flip that. The only time one has a dev with no prod is prior to first release. If environment is the live one, that’s production not dev. Using it for development doesn’t make it a dev environment. It means you only have prod.
minus-squareNaibofTabr@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·3 days agoIt’s a sarcasm about corporate spending decisions. The joke is: Everyone has a test environment. Some are lucky enough to also have a production environment. The point being that if management has decided not to spend resources on a test environment, then “production” is in fact test.
Having production credentials in a dev environment is more stupider but they’ll never learn because they outsourced their thinking.
The thing is Claude would have told them that too, it probably did tbh and they just clicked right through the warning
Dev cycles now.
Everyone has a development environment, but not everyone has a separate production environment.
This is almost certainly the case of dev happening in the live environment.
I think you meant to flip that. The only time one has a dev with no prod is prior to first release.
If environment is the live one, that’s production not dev. Using it for development doesn’t make it a dev environment. It means you only have prod.
It’s a sarcasm about corporate spending decisions. The joke is:
The point being that if management has decided not to spend resources on a test environment, then “production” is in fact test.