VetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 days agoGorgeous women confirming rulediscuss.onlineimagemessage-square91fedilinkarrow-up1631arrow-down16
arrow-up1625arrow-down1imageGorgeous women confirming rulediscuss.onlineVetOfTheSeas@discuss.online to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 days agomessage-square91fedilink
minus-squarekboy101222@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·2 days agoOn one hand, I agree with you, on the other hand I don’t want to impose a military draft on 50-ish % of the population. On the other other hand, true gender equality would be if it didn’t apply to anyone regardless of gender cause fuck drafts
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·2 days agoHaving a country’s population be trained in the military can have some benefits. (Yes I know this is very vague)
minus-squarea_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoHigher education will have a far more profound impact.
minus-squareGoodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoYes, but it requires far more spending by the government.
minus-squareinfinitesunrise@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-22 days agoNot occupying all the time of half your population for two years of their lives probably has greater, less-vague benefit.
On one hand, I agree with you, on the other hand I don’t want to impose a military draft on 50-ish % of the population. On the other other hand, true gender equality would be if it didn’t apply to anyone regardless of gender cause fuck drafts
Having a country’s population be trained in the military can have some benefits. (Yes I know this is very vague)
Higher education will have a far more profound impact.
Yes, but it requires far more spending by the government.
I don’t care.
Yeah but it’s like spending on health
Not occupying all the time of half your population for two years of their lives probably has greater, less-vague benefit.