As such, the results have indicated that
large breasts can be notably aerodynamic through the reduction of drag
and lift. The Flat model incurred a 4% maximum drag increase com-
pared to the Normal model, with an average of approximately 2% span-
ning velocities from 1 to 30 m⋅s-1. The Flat model also experienced
more lift, with a maximum difference being 32% and averaging 22%.
As illustrated, the mechanism behind the drag and lift behaviors ob-
served between both models was elucidated through the analysis of
streamlines around the body and the structures associated with TKE; the
Normal model provides advantageously lower drag and lift by the gen-
eration of stronger vortices from the legs, which in turn originates from
the action of the breasts redirecting the flow around the torso. From
what has been presented in this preliminary work, it is safe to conclude
that the phrase “Flat is Justice” is deficient aerodynamically.
Lazy copy of the outcome:
As such, the results have indicated that large breasts can be notably aerodynamic through the reduction of drag and lift. The Flat model incurred a 4% maximum drag increase com- pared to the Normal model, with an average of approximately 2% span- ning velocities from 1 to 30 m⋅s-1. The Flat model also experienced more lift, with a maximum difference being 32% and averaging 22%. As illustrated, the mechanism behind the drag and lift behaviors ob- served between both models was elucidated through the analysis of streamlines around the body and the structures associated with TKE; the Normal model provides advantageously lower drag and lift by the gen- eration of stronger vortices from the legs, which in turn originates from the action of the breasts redirecting the flow around the torso. From what has been presented in this preliminary work, it is safe to conclude that the phrase “Flat is Justice” is deficient aerodynamically.