• huey_m@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    What composition though? I’ve got well over 100 that are 20+ characters including special characters. I can’t believe this is possible without use of words or something easily guessed.

    I do have a few passwords I keep to myself, and even with my method of taking the first letter from a key phrase or set of song lyrics and switching most to leet speak, I still don’t think I could possibly remember more than a dozen reliably.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can actually generate high entropy passphrases by chaining random words together. You just need to make sure the phrases are actually random and not just whatever comes to your head at the moment.

      Naturally, words help with memorization, but memorizing hundreds of these is impractical at best, especially because long-term memory for infrequently used accounts is subject to “bit rot”.

      • huey_m@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        How many characters are we talking, though? I’ve had passwords as limiting as 16 characters for some services (unfortunately)… that seems small to me for generating real randomness with passphrases.

        That said, fair enough, but as someone who has administered a network before, I would never, ever want my users relying on their brain… the security from a pass manager is practically going to be way better than the standard practices of an average user without one. IMO.

        But hey, color me impressed, honestly.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          The entropy stems from the words, not characters. With random words and no repetition, you have C(n, k) combinations P(n, k) permutations (or n^k with repetition), where n is your dictionary size and k is the number of words you chain together. These passwords tend to be longer, but not by much. A big enough dictionary can yield some pretty high entropy with only a few words.

          I’ve had passwords as limiting as 16 characters for some services (unfortunately)…

          16 characters is hardly enough for random characters unless you include Unicode (which rarely works for those same services that usually have shitty implementations).

          Not much can be done there, sadly. You’re lucky if they even hash their passwords anyway - you’ll probably just get your password emailed to you if you click “forgot password” like it’s 2003.

          I would never, ever want my users relying on their brain…

          I never would either. People should just use a password manager. I was just mentioning an alternative that generated more memorable passphrases, but I wouldn’t advocate for it over random high-entropy strings saved in a password manager.

          • huey_m@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            Yeah, I was particularly irked by that 16 limit I encountered the other day.

            And I stand corrected, then, and color me impressed. I’ll look into doing this for those passwords I need to remember, like masters.

            • TehPers@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              I also should correct myself - it’s not C(n, k), it’s P(n, k) (which is n! / (n-k)!). It’s been a minute since I took a statistics class lol.

              In any case, it’s a lot of entropy with just a few words.