when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 days ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square246fedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down136file-text
arrow-up1129arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 2 days agomessage-square246fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down4·11 hours agoFood is necessary for survival, sex isn’t
minus-squareAntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·6 hours agoSkipping over the fact that killing animals for food isn’t necessary
minus-squareAxxys@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·5 hours agoI feel like that statement needs some caveats. There’s quite a few situations where “killing is necessary for food” is an accurate statement.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·9 hours agoSo, you’d be okay if somebody killed you as long as they ate you afterwards?
Food is necessary for survival, sex isn’t
Skipping over the fact that killing animals for food isn’t necessary
I feel like that statement needs some caveats. There’s quite a few situations where “killing is necessary for food” is an accurate statement.
So, you’d be okay if somebody killed you as long as they ate you afterwards?