• iocase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I went through the same thing with electronics being taught the water model then you’re told to throw that out because AC doesn’t act like water.

    I say bullshit! My instructors didn’t understand AC well enough IMO

    Once you understand AC well enough you realize it still applies to the water model of electrical flow. Induction is inertia, capacitance is pipe deformation from pressure.

    When you slam a valve shut in an old house you make a massive pressure spike (inductive field collapse, flyback voltage spike) which oscillates within a resonant circuit when the pipes absorb that extra pressure by expanding, then releasing that spike back into inertia, which makes a smaller spike back into hoop stress until friction (resistance) saps all of the energy out of the circuit.

    You can make a DC-DC boost converter by opening and closing a valve really quickly on a long pipe and feed the pressure spikes into a check valve.

    • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Aren’t water flow, electrical flow, and mechanical flow all strictly analogous? As in mathematically equivalent, not just similar?

      • iocase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah they are but it seems like most electrical instructors don’t know that they just think “water is close enough as an analogy to electricity but breaks with AC” when in fact they’re both identical. So they’ll tell you to forget the water model while teaching you AC. The inertia/pipe strain comparison is very rare to hear.