Whenever I talk to any Democrat supporters, they by-default cheer their Presidents and then I’ve to remind them of their leader’s illegal wars and war crimes. They condemn those acts and they go back to their cheerleading role - Why do they keep forgetting atrocities committed by their leaders? Why do they accept war criminals as their leader?

  • SirActionSack@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    The poor turnout for Hillary and Kamala suggests they actually do have some opinions on who the leader is.

    • Carighan Maconar@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Yeah americans genuinely would rather have a rapist as a president than a woman, amazing. (jokes aside, you are of course correct that this immediately disproves that theory that people don’t care who the leader is)

      • Lenin's Dumbbell @lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Between War Criminals and Rapist War criminals, Americans definitely prefer the Rapist War Criminals.

        Don’t get me started on how pathetic it was for the non-rapist war criminals to invite one of the most infamous war criminals to their campaign, instead of being, uk, not war criminals

      • Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Americans would rather vote for someone who lies about being anti war, than a fucking bloodthirsty neoliberal war monger? Weird.