Ai Bros always insist that its inevitable and that we have to deal with it. You know how we deal with it? By banning the slop that is generated by llms. Now you deal with it.
The issue is, I don’t think the generative is here to stay. But it’s clear the industrial stuff has solidified. Wifi 7 has AI on an NPU as part of the spec. Because when it can learn the radio signals in the air and the interference it needs to avoid, you get vastly better wifi. BGP is a great protocol for routes between ASes, but it’s dumb protocol, it relies on static rules and metrics. AI overlays are making better routing choices based on learned patterns of traffic, ISPs have seen gains by better optimization.
The industrial grade AI has an objectively proven track record. People can downvote me all they want, none of that matters in the light of fact. AI is in a lot of programming. The stuff that’s proven is the boilerplate. The industrial AI. The generative AI where you ask a few words and get a wbesite, yeah that’s smoke and mirrors. Bridges aren’t useful while they’re being built, they’re only useful after they’re built.
Just like we saw wizards to churn code out back in the day, we’re going to see that with AI in coding. Is the AI going to code at least 50% of the program? Not likely. But having a ban on even 1% AI in code is just unrealistic. One, it denies the reality that we’re already using some AI in tech and coding. Two, you better believe that bad actors are going to be using AI to punch holes in software. And three, it’s completely unenforceable. Flathub lacks the staff to actually police that policy and so it’s going to devolve into Flathub chancing rumors and “hints” on which program has AI in it or not.
And it’s silly because when we have tools and use them correctly, they make our lives easier. Is the 100% generative AI garbage at coding, absolutely. But things like technical documentation, generating API docs, commenting DDL, and so on. Things that we programmers aren’t paid enough for. We talk about commenting our code, who here has time to do that properly? We keep trying to invent all kinds of new ways to “auto-doc”. But now we have a generic documentation generator.
Ai Bros always insist that its inevitable and that we have to deal with it. You know how we deal with it? By banning the slop that is generated by llms. Now you deal with it.
So does the dude who introduced this policy btw. They did this because they’re flooded with low-quality PRs, not because AI only produces slop.
The issue is, I don’t think the generative is here to stay. But it’s clear the industrial stuff has solidified. Wifi 7 has AI on an NPU as part of the spec. Because when it can learn the radio signals in the air and the interference it needs to avoid, you get vastly better wifi. BGP is a great protocol for routes between ASes, but it’s dumb protocol, it relies on static rules and metrics. AI overlays are making better routing choices based on learned patterns of traffic, ISPs have seen gains by better optimization.
The industrial grade AI has an objectively proven track record. People can downvote me all they want, none of that matters in the light of fact. AI is in a lot of programming. The stuff that’s proven is the boilerplate. The industrial AI. The generative AI where you ask a few words and get a wbesite, yeah that’s smoke and mirrors. Bridges aren’t useful while they’re being built, they’re only useful after they’re built.
Just like we saw wizards to churn code out back in the day, we’re going to see that with AI in coding. Is the AI going to code at least 50% of the program? Not likely. But having a ban on even 1% AI in code is just unrealistic. One, it denies the reality that we’re already using some AI in tech and coding. Two, you better believe that bad actors are going to be using AI to punch holes in software. And three, it’s completely unenforceable. Flathub lacks the staff to actually police that policy and so it’s going to devolve into Flathub chancing rumors and “hints” on which program has AI in it or not.
And it’s silly because when we have tools and use them correctly, they make our lives easier. Is the 100% generative AI garbage at coding, absolutely. But things like technical documentation, generating API docs, commenting DDL, and so on. Things that we programmers aren’t paid enough for. We talk about commenting our code, who here has time to do that properly? We keep trying to invent all kinds of new ways to “auto-doc”. But now we have a generic documentation generator.