To be clear this is not a real product or whatever I would just be interested in people’s thoughts.

Do you think you would like privacy focused smart goggles? Eg: no camera/hardware camera lock, all on device intelligence, signal support, idk what else you guys can leave ideas in the comments.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Smart glasses with HUD and speakers, and bluetooth, no cloud dependency - yes, please.

    With camera - absolutely not. This would be just a hidden recording device, absolutely capable of intruding other’s privacy, regardless if it’s cloud connected or not. I realize that camera provides a lot of functionality, but I just don’t see the way how it can preserve privacy of other people and fit in glasses form factor.

    • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Actually, there is a way to use a camera, but I’m not sure if it’s possible from technical or usability perspectives.

      Imagine a device that has a camera, but no data connectivity. No WiFi. Only USB for charging and firmware updates. Maybe BT for firmware or control from app. No memory card slot either. Internal storage reserved for system only, camera software cannot store videos or images persistently.

      This will probably have to be not open source, especially if bluetooth is present - otherwise someone will figure out how to capture camera feed with a custom firmware.

      But if possible, such device can use camera for smart navigation, object recognition, some basic tasks on-device, depending on how much compute (and battery) can be placed into such a small package.

      • northernlights@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        This will probably have to be not open source, especially if bluetooth is present - otherwise someone will figure out how to capture camera feed with a custom firmware.

        Encrypt the traffic and follow proper key management procedures? It wouldn’t exactly be the first open source thing that transmits sensitive data over a network. See you talk about privacy and in one comment find a justification to not disclose the source code. Ahem.

        • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          No, you got me wrong. My position is that I don’t want anything that is capable of recording and that looks like an object that normally can’t do that. So I tried to imagine how something may have camera to capture what user sees, but not be able to store the recordings - only process it in like real-time, or close to it.

          I may not understand the hardware design good enough, but I think if you make an open source device, it should allow custom firmware. If you allow custom firmware, someone will write a version of it that will work around the restriction on recording somehow. To be clear, I’m not concerned about communication protocol interception, but about someone changing how such device handles the data it captures.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The problem there is nobody else will know if yours are the privacy friendly glasses with a camera or not. They’ll just see smart glasses w/ camera. I certainly wouldn’t associate with someone wearing those fucking things, and I’m not going to bother to research which models are which.

        • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          What if the glasses come with a little flag stuck in the frame that says “I’m born blind, this thing helps me be less disabled. It’s not filming you.”? I mean, there are genuinely helpful use cases for such things out there.