Increasingly, Meta has been using debt to fuel its spending, amassing $59 billion in long-term debt on its balance sheet by the end of 2025, double the prior year’s total. And that doesn’t count the “aggressive” accounting it has used to keep the cost of a $27 billion Louisiana data center off its books. “The spending growth looks increasingly unsustainable,” The Wall Street Journal’s “Heard on the Street” columnist Asa Fitch wrote this week.

Now, as the company careens from one staggeringly expensive misadventure to another, its cash-cow core business is starting to wear out. Last quarter, the number of daily active users across its properties declined for the first time to 3.56 billion from 3.58 billion.

  • LiveLM@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I just hope whatever happens doesn’t take the Meta Quest headsets with it.
    They are the cheapest available, and really the only affordables one in my country…

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The main question I have is this: is it going to be replaced by something better (such as federated services)?

    Or will this just mean the Internet as a whole will lose lots of users? That, I think, wouldn’t be desirable. Whatever one may think of Meta, they’ve definitely done a lot to popularize the Internet as a mainstream technology, which by itself is a good thing, though if they use Meta platforms, it ought to be only the first step.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They’re losing rich country users faster that they’re picking up developing country users of lower ARPU.

      Therefore expect revenue to decline, at the same time they’re spending buckets chasing AI as the next pivot.

      They spent $billions on the last pivot and even renamed the company after it, but all their spending on the metaverse amounted to 💩

      • meowmeow@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        And yet they still have lots of money and users. I want them to disappear as much as the average Lemmy user, but let’s not delude ourselves.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          It’s not going anywhere soon. AOL took decades to die.

          But the decline has set in.

          • meowmeow@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Fair, everything dies. AOL died because broadband came around. AOL was pretty awesome in its peak, even if it was tailored to the low end user.

            I don’t think there will be another social network with “friends” again to kill Facebook. I long for the days of OG MySpace.

    • fartsparkles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 hours ago

      They had previously been growing around 40 million to 60 million active users a quarter.

      With this first quarter of minus 20 million active users, it very well could indicate that the Facebook growth engine is over.

      Ultimately we’ll need to see how the next few Qs work out.