Have you guys also noticed this? I’m not talking about “Oh my family isn’t privacy conscious” I honestly get that for ur average moms and pops, they don’t know any better.

the problem is with how these big tech companies effectively poisoned the everyday Joe to think that handing over ur data like a good boy is the norm and breaking out is “weird” and “too much”, this blame also goes on Hollywood.

Yesterday my friend called me " Mr robot" for just taking my privacy seriously I thought it was funny.

some people also fired their single neuron and told me “People only do this when they have something to hide”

These remarks that I face from time to time really highlights the mentality of the general society where if you break out of the norm, even if it doesn’t harm them, they would find a way to make off handed remarks about it almost like they’re dissatisfied that you’re fighting.

  • I don’t talk about privacy with normies. If they bring it up, I’m happy to discuss.

    I think privacy is very slowly becoming more mainstream and a large part of that is thanks to google. Installing “ai” on devices, deleting peoples’ accounts, making installing non-play store apps more difficult, will ultimately encourage more people to degoogle their lives.

    • OppressedBread@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Idk why tf they’re so hell bent on AI, I get that they need a return on their shitty investments but my god the level of detachment from the general public is insane

      • novafunc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Because AIs don’t need salaries, don’t unionize, can work 24/7.

        For some tasks, AI has already completely obsoleted humans. An AI can write a shitty PR filled newsletter faster and cheaper than a human. It keeps getting better at certain tasks, like programming.

        All AI companies want to be the one that controls the best AI. Because if they do, then other companies will pay them to rent out AIs for cheaper than human labor.

        Companies fear falling behind. So they dump loads of money into AI. And currently, investors like hearing about AI. So the more companies say and push AI, it increases investment into the company.

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          It’s way more insidious. “AI” is very much LLMs, or Large language Models. The one thing they excel at is ingesting large amounts of text and summarizing, or looking for key points, as directed, and sometimes with non-exact directions.

          Large amounts of text, like your browsing history, your personal cloud-stored files, your chats and messages your email. Your taxes. Your bank records. Your not-yet filed patents. Your medical research. Your political donations. Your protest plans. Your sources for the journalism you are doing.

          At scale, society-wide. Zoom back and predict the markets overall sentiment. Zoom in down to a single “undesirable”.

          All that “it’ll do human creative jobs you have to pay so much for, and if you reduce headcount you’ll get a nice bonus” is for all the short-thinking middle management and vapid C-levels to get suckered by the Mechanical Turk show into think they’ll get a bonus this quarter by putting all their sensitive information on someone else’s computer.

          And once their IT staff is minimized and hardware is out of reach, you have achieved vendor lock-in.

          And it’s absolutely incredible how literally everyone seems to have fallen for this shiny turd.

          I mean cmon, “Palantir”? They were literally created for this purpose.

      • ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        If you happen to want to know more on why, there are 2 podcasts that talk about this on a very regular basis:

        • Deep Questions with Cal Newport - super chill guy that every week has an episode on ai reality check. Usually explains quite at length why something is happening on ai why is factual or not
        • Better offline - Ed can be quite opinionated and sometimes borderline ranty, but he also tends to breakdown stuff like financial numbers on ai investment and why (or why not) you should break those down.
        • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          I think thatsa great description of Zitron. His editorial style initially turned me off but he is thorough and shows his sources for the factual sides of his arguments.

      • Yeah, I don’t get it either. I read that only 3% of companies using “ai” saw a return on investment. Companies started re-hiring the humans because the “ai” turns out to be shit. We can’t even produce the power to run these models at scale.