zjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 24 hours agoSpicy Air ☢️lemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1372arrow-down190file-text
arrow-up1282arrow-down1imageSpicy Air ☢️lemmy.dbzer0.comzjti8eit@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 24 hours agomessage-square126fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·11 hours agoThat video is strange marketing nonsense. Running a train doesn’t apply the same forces and wear-down as nature will, just ask your mother.
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down2·11 hours agoMy momma doesn’t work in hazardous materials handling, I do. So maybe your mom can ask me?
minus-squareA_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·11 hours agoso a train will be less terrible than to be stored in seismically inactive rock?
minus-squareHellieSkellie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoyes, see: https://lemmy.cafe/comment/17134894 When you run a test, you want to minimize variables and keep as many things constant as possible between tests if you want to prove something. Amazingly there are not a lot of constants between seismically inactive rock and a fucking train
That video is strange marketing nonsense. Running a train doesn’t apply the same forces and wear-down as nature will, just ask your mother.
My momma doesn’t work in hazardous materials handling, I do. So maybe your mom can ask me?
so a train will be less terrible than to be stored in seismically inactive rock?
yes, see: https://lemmy.cafe/comment/17134894
When you run a test, you want to minimize variables and keep as many things constant as possible between tests if you want to prove something.
Amazingly there are not a lot of constants between seismically inactive rock and a fucking train