LadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agoNeurodiverse problemspiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1866arrow-down110
arrow-up1856arrow-down1imageNeurodiverse problemspiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneLadyButterfly she/her@piefed.blahaj.zone to Autism@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days ago Your argument here is the good’ol “but you get what they’re trying to say here?” You and test don’t exist in a vacuum: you can conjure context from your knowledge about the world.
minus-squareokamiueru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoNot denying that. Do you think that is the argument here?
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoPoint is - the question from test is good enough.
minus-squareokamiueru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoIf you only want answers from the type of people who can conjure this information, and do so in the same way, sure. What a weird thing to assume about the people answering the question, huh?
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoI mean, additional questions and struggle from the respondent are valuable insight by itself in this context.
You and test don’t exist in a vacuum: you can conjure context from your knowledge about the world.
Not denying that. Do you think that is the argument here?
Point is - the question from test is good enough.
If you only want answers from the type of people who can conjure this information, and do so in the same way, sure. What a weird thing to assume about the people answering the question, huh?
I mean, additional questions and struggle from the respondent are valuable insight by itself in this context.