Start coding today with Coddy Tech – learn for free or get 20% off any Pro Plan with code FERN20: https://fern.deals/coddy (ad)This is the story of Onavo.Sou...
Writing a summary takes work; which you are asking me to do to convince you to watch. I am sharing something I think is worth sharing; particularly as it may be used for people you know who are new to privacy. The title is edited to remove the cliff hanger and the description states exactly what the video will be about. If you don’t find that adequate for your time that is your problem. I don’t find it adequate to use more of my time to convince you further.
Please tell me what about the description or title are misleading. They have all the keywords you need to find an article if you really care about the material being written.
Do you think that it’s possible your feelings aren’t accurate, considering how many people are telling you so, across all the instances and communities you made the same post on?
People’s remarks have a theme that they want to know what the video will be about. I feel the title and description fit the criteria. I also feel it is excessive to ask for a summary. That takes far longer to write.
So what information is really missing here. The offending VPN is in the title. Anyone that wants to know more can use the keyword for an article of their choosing. The description is to the point that the video covers how FB wiretapped people with said VPN.
Again, are you open to the possibility that your feelings aren’t accurate considering, last time I read, all but two comments across half a dozen posts on different instances are telling you that?
Writing a summary takes work; which you are asking me to do to convince you to watch. I am sharing something I think is worth sharing; particularly as it may be used for people you know who are new to privacy. The title is edited to remove the cliff hanger and the description states exactly what the video will be about. If you don’t find that adequate for your time that is your problem. I don’t find it adequate to use more of my time to convince you further.
Please tell me what about the description or title are misleading. They have all the keywords you need to find an article if you really care about the material being written.
If you cared about getting people to watch the video you posted you would have rewritten the post when asked.
If you cared about your time you wouldn’t be replying.
A summary is a big ask and you’re not entitled to my time for your convenience.
I’m not trying to get your time. A careful reading of my reply would make it clear I’m trying to help you to accomplish your goals more efficiently.
That’s respecting your time.
Yeah, and I am explaining that I feel my post was sufficient to that criteria explaining what the video will be about.
Do you think that it’s possible your feelings aren’t accurate, considering how many people are telling you so, across all the instances and communities you made the same post on?
People’s remarks have a theme that they want to know what the video will be about. I feel the title and description fit the criteria. I also feel it is excessive to ask for a summary. That takes far longer to write.
So what information is really missing here. The offending VPN is in the title. Anyone that wants to know more can use the keyword for an article of their choosing. The description is to the point that the video covers how FB wiretapped people with said VPN.
Again, are you open to the possibility that your feelings aren’t accurate considering, last time I read, all but two comments across half a dozen posts on different instances are telling you that?
I’m open to it. Some comments had clients that didn’t display the description.