ITT I learn that oligarch gabe nawel is the elon musk of gamers

  • Banzai51@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Not a monopoly. Only people mad at Steam are competitors. Competitors focus on shareholders, Steam focuses on gamers, you know, their customers.

    • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Steam takes 30% of a developers sale. That’s a pretty heft price tag.

      People don’t call Steam a monopoly (though it pretty much is) because they don’t mind steam.

      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you google for 5 minutes, you’d find that 30% cut has been in gaming for ages. Back in the day 30% would include physical printing, transporting, store space. Today Valve’s 30% means forever-downloadable, always in your game list, cloud saves, linux support, community features. If only Valve didnt use income from that 30% to make their service better and grow their user base while at it.

        • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          This doesn’t change the fact that they are a de facto monopoly, but gamers defend it because they like steam.

          They can be a likeable company and still be a monopoly.