• turdas@suppo.fi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I think Mars, assuming you terraform it, would be pretty close to that on both counts. Space planes might still be difficult, but the delta V is much lower and Olympus Mons would pretty much sit above the atmosphere.

    • YellowParenti@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Holy shit, I hadn’t considered that you could use Olympus Mons as a launch site cause it sticks so high up.

      • turdas@suppo.fi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        17 hours ago

        The best part about it is that it’s an extremely gradual slope completely unlike the mountain ranges on Earth, so you could haul stuff up there on trucks or trains easily.

        • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          17 hours ago

          The problem is you can’t have mountains like that on tectonically active planets (a mountain that big on earth would sink into the mantle), which is kind of a prequisite for a long-term magnetosphere so its unfortunately not something a species could likely ever have except as a result of terraforming a world like mars and setting up some kind of artificial magnetosphere.

          • cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Is there a lower density limit for having a magnetosphere though? A habitable planet with 1.5x earth radius and the same mass would be much easier to get off of.

            • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              17 hours ago

              I guess that could work? Earth is actually the densest planet in the solar system so our baseline mass > size ratio might actually be a bit abnormal.