CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agoIs this correct? If so, this is not acceptable.lemmy.mlimagemessage-square59fedilinkarrow-up1425arrow-down148file-text
arrow-up1377arrow-down1imageIs this correct? If so, this is not acceptable.lemmy.mlCaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml to Firefox@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square59fedilinkfile-text
Edit: Replies to this thread indicate this is not fully correct as it exists on all browsers; and is likely an ad thing.
minus-squareSuperb@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up183arrow-down3·1 year agoIf the person who tweeted this scrolled down in the hackernews thread, they’d see this code was misinterpreted. It’s part of an anti Adblock script that runs 5s after page load. Still shitty, but less insidious
minus-squareJohanno@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoOh they think that delay in the beginning is malicious . I noticed a huge drop in bandwidth until I logged out of YouTube. This was a onetimer however.
If the person who tweeted this scrolled down in the hackernews thread, they’d see this code was misinterpreted. It’s part of an anti Adblock script that runs 5s after page load. Still shitty, but less insidious
Oh they think that delay in the beginning is malicious .
I noticed a huge drop in bandwidth until I logged out of YouTube. This was a onetimer however.