• zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    The world building is weak because Rowling is a bad fantasy writer, not because it was written for grade schoolers. There are tons of series aimed at grade schoolers with incredible world building - Redwall, Warrior Cats, Earthsea, just to name a few, all have way better world building than Harry Potter.

    • ratsnake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Eh, I think it’s a bit of both? The first books just generally where fairly whimsy and light-hearted and you don’t really need your demographics and societal structures to make sense when you are writing a whimsical, light-hearted story for kids.

      The later books become darker and more serious so the artifacts of those earlier worldbuilding decisions become more and more obvious over time.

    • absentbird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Earthsea has some of the best world building of all time, but I’m not sure I’d say it was written for grade schoolers.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I feel like Earthsea is appropriate for middle-school-aged kids (so like 11-14ish), right? Maybe our definitions of “grade schoolers” is different, but I was trying to give examples for a wide range of ages

        • absentbird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Actually that’s totally fair. There’s just some heady concepts in there, it certainly makes HP look much more childish and goofy.