cm0002@europe.pub to Programming@programming.dev · 9 天前GitHub: We going to train on your data after allwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1271arrow-down12cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1269arrow-down1external-linkGitHub: We going to train on your data after allwww.theregister.comcm0002@europe.pub to Programming@programming.dev · 9 天前message-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down58·9 天前Oh no, they will improve the service with public data, how horrible
minus-squareugo@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up52·9 天前No, they will be using user’s copyrighted work, including that which is in a “private” repository, to extract value for themselves.
minus-squareVenat0r@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·8 天前Also the AI is trained on FOSS code but then used to make closed code that ignores the open licenses of the FOSS code that it copied.
minus-squareLojcs@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down4·edit-29 天前If you use a public ai agent on it your repo isn’t really ‘private’
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·8 天前The amout and quality of training data correlates with quality of AI models.
minus-squareMousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 天前They can pay me for consent to use my data, then.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·6 天前They pay you 100 times over with the service
minus-squareEReaso@mstdn.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 天前@garbage_world @MousePotatoDoesStuff hopefully they skip the confirmation bias in the repos with their API keys exposed and commits with a message “hide API key” that we can see the diff of.
minus-squaregarbage_world@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·8 天前https://github.com/First-Non-Interesting-Username/NixOS-config please find an exposed API key or other secret.
Oh no, they will improve the service with public data, how horrible
No, they will be using user’s copyrighted work, including that which is in a “private” repository, to extract value for themselves.
Also the AI is trained on FOSS code but then used to make closed code that ignores the open licenses of the FOSS code that it copied.
If you use a public ai agent on it your repo isn’t really ‘private’
> Microslop
> improve
The amout and quality of training data correlates with quality of AI models.
They can pay me for consent to use my data, then.
They pay you 100 times over with the service
@garbage_world @MousePotatoDoesStuff hopefully they skip the confirmation bias in the repos with their API keys exposed and commits with a message “hide API key” that we can see the diff of.
https://github.com/First-Non-Interesting-Username/NixOS-config
please find an exposed API key or other secret.