Ek-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agoUbuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUDlockmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square168fedilinkarrow-up1483arrow-down145
arrow-up1438arrow-down1imageUbuntu's trust problem in 4 concrete issues - verified facts, no FUDlockmedia.piefed.socialEk-Hou-Van-Braai@piefed.social to Linux@programming.devEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square168fedilink
minus-squareLawnman23@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25·1 day agoIronically, just read an article recently about this exact issue. https://itsfoss.com/opinion/why-hate-ubuntu/
minus-squareSips'@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 day agoThe article from LinuxTeck is AI generated. Not unlikely the itsfoss was used as inspiration or whatever since ot was posted the week before.
minus-squareHamartiogonic@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-222 hours ago No prompt. No warning. No consent. This was not a bug. It was a deliberate product decision. Yeah… too many rhetorical devices. A human writer would notice that it’s getting a bit excessive.
Ironically, just read an article recently about this exact issue.
https://itsfoss.com/opinion/why-hate-ubuntu/
The article from LinuxTeck is AI generated. Not unlikely the itsfoss was used as inspiration or whatever since ot was posted the week before.
Yeah… too many rhetorical devices. A human writer would notice that it’s getting a bit excessive.