• jeffep@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I enjoy walking and don’t mind walking even for 40 minutes in the morning. Not every day, but if it fits in the schedule it gives me more movement in practice than a bike (also due to some local circumstances).

    The point was more generally that walking is a great alternative. Everyone hypes bicycles, walking has no lobby and is one of the healthiest things to add to your day.

    Also, if the goal is to lose weight, cardio is fine but only supportive at best. It’s way more effective to eat less calorie dense food than trying to run/bike it off. The difference between an hour walking and biking is negligible for most people compared to dietary changes.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The difference between an hour walking and biking is easily 10+ miles, not exactly negligible if you have somewhere to go.

      • jeffep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        What kind of madman is gonna argue against walking? 😅 Get some sleep bro

        But honestly: you looking for a hobby? Go cycling all you want. You looking to get somewhere? The place will not change position at random. You know where you want to go. In my reality bike or foot rarely matter if I’m going to the supermarket or wherever. Just leave 10 minutes earlier and you’re good. In this kind of situation, your choice is between losing a few more kcals by walking or saving a few minutes by taking the bike. Both are good options, neither is going to make you fat or thin. If that’s your goal, eat less calorie dense food.