• dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It really isn’t though. I’ve done in on Windows, Mac, and Linux.

    Mac and Linux are easier to install stuff but on the whole the experience has been almost identical.

    • r1veRRR@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      What exactly are we talking about? Doing Windows related development on Windows is roughly as decent as doing Linux related development is on Linux (or Mac).

      It’s just that because like 90% of servers are Linux, 90% of development benefits far more from being developed on a Linux-y system.

      For example, the Windows filesystem is very different. Over and over I’ve had issues with permissions being different, with paths being inconsistent (this happens esp. with WSL) and with limits on path length.

      You can develop on Windows, but having the test env closer to the real env takes care of so many little headaches.

    • R00bot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      You’ve used modern Linux and modern Windows and think the experience is almost identical? That’s an uncommon opinion.

      • dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s an uncommon opinion here. Here being the operative word.

        Look in I’m not going to say I wasn’t disappointed that it wasn’t Mac which I used at my last job, but when it comes down to what we need to do in a day I don’t notice the difference.

        I tried Linux last year as a daily driver and gave up as I’m not looking for something else to debug in my own time. I now just want it to work.