• Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Given that copy desks were being gutted more than a decade ago just with little things like Grammarly, it absolutely will replace knowledge jobs. It won’t be better, but it will mean more share buybacks.

    • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It doesn’t need to be good to replace jobs, as long as there are no consequences for the people making those decisions.

      I’ve lost count of how many “oops, it was AI’s fault, not my fault!” stories I’ve heard, even within highly regulated fields. Like, lawyers submitting documents with completely fake citations, and then…no real consequences. Seems to me like that should be cause for immediate disbarment, but no, apparently not.

      • stravanasu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        The lack of consequences has been a problem for quite a while now, from before LLMs. In my opinion it’s been caused by a widespread increase in professional incompetence, together with a mutually protective network of incompetent people. “I won’t point out that you’re incompetent and won’t blame you for your mistakes, if you do me the same favour”.

        They call it “imposter syndrome”, but it isn’t a syndrome: it’s a symptom.