• irmadlad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m not so much worried about ‘vibe coding’ as long as the dev actually knows the validity of the code presented in the LLM. At that point, the LLM becomes the assistant, not the dev itself. However, if I were to speculate, this dev team didn’t, got called on it, didn’t know how to respond or validate the code, so they closed up shop.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        The term ‘vibe coding’ I think was originally about generating and using code without understanding it

        • orgrinrt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 minutes ago

          Yeah doesn’t sound like vibe coding if you actually go through the necessary dances anyway, i.e double-check the produced code and validate it and actually understand it and the domain.

          Edit: But almost nobody does. Because then you’d rather just write it yourself and save time, money and energy…