A Nobel laureate’s environmentally friendly invention that provides clean water if central supplies are knocked out by a hurricane or drought, could be a life saver for vulnerable islands, its founder says.
The invention, by the chemist Prof Omar Yaghi, uses a type of science called reticular chemistry to create molecularly engineered materials, which can extract moisture from the air and harvest water even in arid and desert conditions.
Atoco, a technology company that Yaghi founded, said their units, comparable in size to a 20-foot shipping container and powered entirely by ultra-low-grade thermal energy, could be placed in local communities to generate up to 1,000 litres of clean water every day, even if centralised electricity and water sources are interrupted by drought or storm damage.
Yaghi, who won the 2025 Nobel prize award in chemistry, said the invention would change the world and benefit islands in the Caribbean, which are prone to drought. He added that it could be a solution for countries needing to get water to marooned communities after hurricanes such as Beryl and Melissa, which left thousands without water.
@JustAnotherPodunk @wolfyvegan Sounds good. Have you shipped your solution to disaster areas? How did it go? Did they work as planned?
Nope. I havent. Never put any effort into it. But I do know a fluff piece when I see one. My point was, this isn’t revolutionary tech. And it’s not being rolled out all over the place either. They built it and rolled it out onto a Caribbean island. Is it actually scalable? Is it practical? We don’t know. What I see is that it’s part of a campaign piece to solicit funding. Fairly obviously too.
This is just building a better mousetrap. Sure, some good can come from it. I hope it does. But I’m not going to prop up every article that doesn’t pass the sniff test. Cancer already would have been cured a thousand times over if you were to believe every article promising that “this is the fix we’ve been waiting for”
@JustAnotherPodunk Very noble of you. So, you don’t know anything about it, hope some good comes of it, but don’t think they should seek funding for it because the idea isn’t utterly original. Good work all round.
I know as much as you do about it. All that either of us know is what we directly read in the article. And it has a clear bias and motive imo.
I never said they shouldn’t seek funding. I’m calling out the article for being an obvious vehicle to solicit funding. They already published it. I don’t opposed that. I oppose the method and hype train mentality exhibited.
It’s true, the idea isn’t utterly original, but I don’t think it’s meritless. But I’m not going to read into something like this article and fantasize this contraption as the ultimate solution to water scarcity in deficient locals.
Please don’t mistake my skepticism for willful ignorance. But please do get off of your high horse
@JustAnotherPodunk And there you go.
Aw come on. You can put more effort into a rebuttlal than that. I used all those fancy words to explain my opinion. Don’t just cop out and fold like that. It’s lazy and trollish behavior.