Brdsnest Lemmy
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 13 hours ago

Morge continvoucly

discuss.tchncs.de

message-square
37
fedilink
212

Morge continvoucly

discuss.tchncs.de

state_electrician@discuss.tchncs.de to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 13 hours ago
message-square
37
fedilink

This was from official Microslop documentation https://web.archive.org/web/20260216165612/https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/training/modules/introduction-to-github/3-components-of-github-flow

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Gonzako@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    I just made master become what gets pushed to the actual website so I do have to take it into consideration

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 hours ago

    To be honest, what I’m most mad about isn’t the typoes, it’s that someone generated this image and figured, yeah alright, that will clear things up.

    On some level you want to believe that even if someone does not come up with a proper concept for a visualization, that they still check what the AI shat out, so that it’s at the very least not conceptually wrong and not confusing.

    This image isn’t just shitty, it’s actively worse than having no visualization. They could’ve generated that, chuckled, and not used it. Just how do you blunder your perception check so badly that you decide to include it anyways?

  • balsoft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I really hope “morging continvoucly” becomes a meme and is used to mock microsoft forever

    • criss_cross@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I for one will use it continvoucly.

  • pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well, that explains a lot about the product quality. Their entire development workflow is a complete fucking mess.

    • Long-lived feature branches.
    • Creating merge commits to main just for the sole purpose of tagging them as releases while also maintaining separate release branches.
    • Force-pushing tags to incorporate post-release hotfixes instead of releasing minor patch updates.
    • Taking bugfixes from releases and merging them back into the development branch (have they not heard of cherry-pick?)
    • Always using merges even when a rebase would be easier to follow and keep the history more straightforward.
    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I admire your ability to interpret anything into this fucking picture…

    • figjam@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Whats a merge? We be morging up here

      • A7thStone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It’s morgin time

  • First_Thunder@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Thank god we are going opposite to the Tim direction

    • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Tirm

    • lonesomeCat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, Fuck Tim

  • Gyroplast@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The 15yo “source” for the sloppy plagiarism: https://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/

    • apotheotic (she/her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

    • credo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      OP responded to the great Morge: https://nvie.com/posts/15-years-later/

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Wow, it stole it badly enough that it might not count as copyright infringement in court, but it also stole it badly enough that it isn’t useful at all.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      12 hours ago

      holy fuck, it’s basically the time I followed a tutorial for generating “a witch” for AI art, and ended up with a horribly mangled MTG card

    • pizza_the_hutt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It’s still not a bad system if you have to support and provide bugfixes for multiple versions of software. However, if you only support the latest version and only create bug fixes and features based on the latest release or main branch, then git-flow is way overkill.

      • lmmarsano@group.lt
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It’s an atrocious, pointlessly complicated system resulting in convoluted project histories prone to confusion. Trunk-based development with sensible tags of releases & hotfixes achieves the same thing without the junk complexity. Git flow isn’t overkill, it’s just ill-conceived.

        • thesmokingman@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          This is a joke, right? OneFlow isn’t trunk-based development and is actually gitflow with different steps. I have yet to see any org actually use trunk-based development mostly because I’ve not seen cherry-picking from the trunk adopted at any large scale.

          • draycs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            What is large scale to you? We have 100-200 developers doing something fairly close to trunk based development. Including cherry picking from trunk when possible (not always practical for sufficiently old release branches)

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I pushed my team to use trunk based development. We did cherry-picks from trunk to release branches for a couple years with no issues. Since then, I’ve written a GitHub action that automates the cherry-picks based on tickets in the commit messages.

            But even before the automation, it drastically improved our dev processes.

            We weren’t on Git Flow exactly, but it was a bastardized version of it.

            Having used TBD successfully for like 5-6 years now. I can’t imagine using Git Flow.

  • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    git Morge perfec t flow for put code in to re\lease! inside very Bronch and Featue code morge continvoucly put code in Git Morge. no problems ever in gitt morge because good Flow and Barnch for code morge conflict of big code releas. Agit Morge yes a place for a code put code in git morge can trust Tirm for giveing good morge to code. friend morge

    • xep@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Wish I hadn’t read this while drinking my tea.

    • JetpackJackson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I know this is a meme but what is it from

      • goatinspace@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        From 1985 when plutonium was pure and future considered 2015.

      • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I based it on the pelcan Mouth perfec t size for put baby in pasta

        • JetpackJackson@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Thats the one, thank you!

          • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            No worries! pelcan Mouth perfec t meme for make snowclone of.

            • JetpackJackson@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              :3

  • RustyNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I love git flow but the GitHub tooling is bad. It forces you into GitHubflow which is very confusing for those building from source

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Stat of release

    The image genAI is also from Boston.

  • goatinspace@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 hours ago

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I feel it’s a bad sign that I’m saving this meme for use at work

      • 𝓹𝓻𝓲𝓷𝓬𝓮𝓼𝓼@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Everybody has a testing environment. Some people are lucky enough enough to have a totally separate environment to run production in.

  • jcorvera@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    And Microsoft stole it from a different developer, who posted it back in 2011… and then ran it through Copilot without even checking it thoroughly before adding it to training documentation.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Tim is going backwards in time

  • 0ops@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Major featue UwU

  • rtxn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    deleted by creator

Programmer Humor@programming.dev

programmer_humor@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmer_humor@programming.dev

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.16K users / day
  • 4.19K users / week
  • 8.4K users / month
  • 18K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 29.8K subscribers
  • 1.81K Posts
  • 54.4K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Feyter@programming.dev
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • BurningTurtle@programming.dev
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.5
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org