Not really.

But the military does, because further improvement allows stealthier micro-camera-transmitters and things like that.

So they don’t let you buy a phone that lasts 10 years with a giant battery and a 6-square-inch SoC at a good price.

They make you buy overpriced short lived phones with tiny chips and batteries, to make you want the next newest most power-efficient chip, with 5G or 6G wireless. Thanks to your support, they can deploy a global network of this tech, and use it for things like MilliMobiles and NSO Group device access.

They don’t let the prices go down at full speed on hard drives, RAM, graphics cards, etc. They can just print money to get as much as they need, while worker ants have to provide heavy support to the industry if we want table scraps. We even have to argue about what we do and don’t “own” after buying it.

All for their surveillance state, to control you in service of eroding your constitutional rights (not to mention bombing kids and protecting sexual predator islands)

  • whoever loves Digit 🇵🇸🇺🇸🏴‍☠️@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Why more power efficiency than we have today?

    It will be useful for stuff like generating videos, but I would put the focus on more efficient software for that

    Not that power efficiency should stop. It’s just I have no reason to pay for R&D to improve it, if I could just buy a long-lifespan device with a big chip and a big battery instead