UltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 个月前Not that limitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1562arrow-down127
arrow-up1535arrow-down1imageNot that limitlemmy.worldUltraHamster64@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 个月前message-square41fedilink
minus-squaremercano@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down2·2 个月前That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
minus-squarechicken@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·2 个月前There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
minus-squareAlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18arrow-down3·edit-22 个月前ChatGPT is such garbage. edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
minus-squarebunchberry@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 个月前ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
minus-squarePeppycito@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 个月前Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.
That’s a ChatGPT kind of answer. A pattern is recognized, but the meaning isn’t understood.
There’s no way ChatGPT would be creative enough to put a number on its side
ChatGPT is such garbage.
edit: The people down voting me clearly are bots or GPT fanbois. In AI circles nobody thinks ChatGPT is good.
ChatGPT just gives the correct answer that the limit doesn’t exist.
claude is gaud
Rote learning isn’t new and is still quite popular.