many channels pretend to be human-made, but are just AI slop.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I like that it isn’t just a binary “yes/no”. IMCO there’s a big difference between using AI to generate a few assets/b-roll, and entirely automated video pipelines.

  • corvus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    It struck me how seamlessly AI can now mimic human creativity, to the point where it’s nearly impossible to distinguish between human-made and AI-generated content.

    And let any non trained people to subjectively judge if the content is AI generated? With the latest versions of video generation models we are already in the situation where only software can tell if some videos are AI generated or not. Lots of channels will be wrongly tagged.

    • robbbin@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Fair enough. Though I don’t know about your point regarding the software tools. The ones I tried had pretty bad accuracy (and were quite resource-intensive to run) So, I felt like the human-tagging way was still the most sensible way forward. At least for now, where there are still subtle cues that give AI-content away once in a while.

      • VoxAliorum@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Adding a link to such a tool with “If you are unsure you can use xyz. Note that these are often inaccurate” would be enough to address this.

  • TimeWalker@piefed.foxden.party
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think it’s a pretty good idea. I personally don’t have an issue seeing if it’s AI slop as for me, they seem to be still very obvious with cuts not making sense, the generic male or female voice or even script errors. However, I can see it for channels that are using it more in a hidden manner like JCS’ video “Newlyweds Tell on Each Other”, which has since been deleted because of the backlash.

  • angrywaffle@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s been hard to find good websites in top results of search engines. A lot of them are very well SEO tuned AI slop.

    • Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Especially on Duck Duck Go. Ugh. It’s so bad sometimes. You search for a topic and the first page is all blog style websites with rambling, garbage A.I. text.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Mojeek and Ecosia are building their own index, and then you don’t need to subscribe to a service that’s all-in on AI

        • Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Every time I try mojeek it’s the worse experience ever. Ask Jeeves was more reliable.

          Never heard of exosia tho have to try it.

        • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          I’m not really against AI (specifically text-based GenAI), but AI does change the reality of using the internet. I need to be able to promote trustworthy domains in my search results and accumulate such a list over years.

          Brave search technically has such a feature, but firstly the owner is a homophobe, and secondly the feature isn’t really as power-user oriented as I’d like.