Five@slrpnk.net to Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 个月前Society is Limited by Wage Slaveryslrpnk.netimagemessage-square204fedilinkarrow-up11.26Karrow-down122
arrow-up11.24Karrow-down1imageSociety is Limited by Wage Slaveryslrpnk.netFive@slrpnk.net to Anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 2 个月前message-square204fedilink
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前no it’s the normal level. the 48% is the maximum. i don’t see why you can’t have ubi and progressive taxation at the same time. you can tailor the curve to work with the extra money. you can even set the maximum rate at 100% for people who earn more than, say, 10M a year.
minus-squareFlauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前It would just be pretty redundant. And a flat tax rate is a lot more transparent
minus-squareFlauschige_Lemmata@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 个月前And a UBI helps poor people more. If you want to help them even more still, just raise the UBI
no it’s the normal level. the 48% is the maximum.
i don’t see why you can’t have ubi and progressive taxation at the same time. you can tailor the curve to work with the extra money. you can even set the maximum rate at 100% for people who earn more than, say, 10M a year.
It would just be pretty redundant. And a flat tax rate is a lot more transparent
it also tends to hit poor people harder.
And a UBI helps poor people more. If you want to help them even more still, just raise the UBI