The nonconsentual sexualised depiction is in and of itself abuse. Get that through your skull, you dense motherfucker. Revenge porn is abuse not necessarily because what it depicts is an act of abuse, but because the material itself is distributed in a manner that violates the consent of the person(s) depicted. Similarly, editing a child’s likeness into a pornographic context is CSAM. Making a machine do likewise is CSAM.
Doubling down this hard to say this isn’t actually abuse is a really bad look for you and atp I’m convinced that you’re a total creep. I’m sure others are, too.
Depictions could somehow be twice as illegal as the real event, and they still wouldn’t be the same thing. It literally did not take place.
The nonconsentual sexualised depiction is in and of itself abuse. Get that through your skull, you dense motherfucker. Revenge porn is abuse not necessarily because what it depicts is an act of abuse, but because the material itself is distributed in a manner that violates the consent of the person(s) depicted. Similarly, editing a child’s likeness into a pornographic context is CSAM. Making a machine do likewise is CSAM.
Doubling down this hard to say this isn’t actually abuse is a really bad look for you and atp I’m convinced that you’re a total creep. I’m sure others are, too.