ByroTriz@lemmy.ml to

Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

Privacy = no free speech

1.64K

Privacy = no free speech

ByroTriz@lemmy.ml to

Privacy@lemmy.ml · 1 year ago

Chat

Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
link
fedilink
arrow-up
44
arrow-down
1·
edit-2
1 year ago
Whether or not USA Today believes in free speech, its sponsors to not. They expect brand safe conduct.

Also USA Today’s upper management has opinions on what they would publish. You won’t see pro-anarchist op-eds in USA Today.

That said, news agencies are less good for getting news rather used in conjunction with others to confirm their veracity.

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don’t promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

237 users / day
1.99K users / week
5.4K users / month
15.7K users / 6 months
1 local subscriber
32.5K subscribers
3.19K Posts
83.1K Comments
Modlog