• halvar@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Ehh. I’m not sure it’s very constructive to make a topological argument from a debate people usually think about as a linguistic one.

    • Derpenheim@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I like to think of this particular example as a sort of reminder that we need to be specific on what grounds we are arguing. Colloquially, and for the sake of practicality, the straw has two holes. You would one hole or the other is in the drink, or clogged. But topologically, yes, there is only one hole.

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Except maybe to illustrate the necessity of various disciplines, as this is a maths problem and not a linguistics one.

      Arguing the linguistics of this is like arguing over astrology.