cm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 10 hours agoHDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.www.heise.deexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down11cross-posted to: opensource@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1135arrow-down1external-linkHDMI Forum is unwilling to disclose the 2.1 specification for open-source (Linux): according to AMD, they had submitted a functional, HDMI 2.1-compatible driver [for linux?], which the Forum rejected.www.heise.decm0002@lemmings.world to Opensource@programming.dev · 10 hours agomessage-square15fedilinkcross-posted to: opensource@lemmy.ml
minus-squareSuccessful_Try543@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 hours agoIt’s “pay or OK”, the “pur” subscription isn’t needed for viewing the content. They’ll probably gonna stick to that until the highest court has finally ruled that “pay or OK” is not OK at all.
It’s “pay or OK”, the “pur” subscription isn’t needed for viewing the content. They’ll probably gonna stick to that until the highest court has finally ruled that “pay or OK” is not OK at all.